<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Art Not Ads</title>
	<link>http://www.artnotads.com/blog</link>
	<description>Replacing intrusive, mind-numbing advertising with something thought-provoking</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bubble project by Art Not Ads &#187; Anti-Advertising Agency sticks it to the ad-man</title>
		<link>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2006/10/27/bubble-project/#comment-1360</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2006/10/27/bubble-project/#comment-1360</guid>
					<description>[...] Bubble project - cartoon speech-bubbles to stick onto posters. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Bubble project - cartoon speech-bubbles to stick onto posters. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Printable coldsores by Art Not Ads &#187; Anti-Advertising Agency sticks it to the ad-man</title>
		<link>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/03/02/printable-coldsores/#comment-1359</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/03/02/printable-coldsores/#comment-1359</guid>
					<description>[...] Printable cold sores [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Printable cold sores [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abstractor by Art Not Ads &#187; Anti-Advertising Agency sticks it to the ad-man</title>
		<link>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/01/14/abstractortv/#comment-1358</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/01/14/abstractortv/#comment-1358</guid>
					<description>[...] Light criticism: Advertising is the vandalism of the Fortune 500. A project to subvert public video billboards, similar to Ji Lee&#8217;s Abstractor TV and Jason Eppink&#8217;s pixelator. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Light criticism: Advertising is the vandalism of the Fortune 500. A project to subvert public video billboards, similar to Ji Lee&#8217;s Abstractor TV and Jason Eppink&#8217;s pixelator. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Golden Gate Billboard by Idetrorce</title>
		<link>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/10/23/the-golden-gate-billboard/#comment-997</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/10/23/the-golden-gate-billboard/#comment-997</guid>
					<description>very interesting, but I don't agree with you 
Idetrorce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting, but I don&#8217;t agree with you<br />
Idetrorce
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 120 years of hating advertising by Michael Dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/12/13/120-years-of-hating-advertising/#comment-996</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/12/13/120-years-of-hating-advertising/#comment-996</guid>
					<description>It's interesting to watch corporate marketing's more thoughtful practitioners (the ones who even bother to think about larger issues) contort themselves to find comfort with their own trade.  Murketing wants to contend that, since advertising has always been unpopular, then popular revulsion against it is just a constant thing that need not trouble anybody.  Besides, murketing says, the dislike for corporate brainwashing campaigns has never really led to action, so it must be mere trivia:

"Clearly there were people who could “see through” marketing in the late 19th century, and who could count an audience that would get the joke. Just as clearly, seeing through marketing didn’t quite add up to resisting marketing. Kinda like today."

What murketing fails to mention is the complete and consistent lack of avenues for opposing the marketing juggernaut.  The topic has always been forbidden in politics.  What would happen if it became a topic of ongoing democratic debate?  We may never know, because that prospect is ANATHEMA to the moneyed elite, who own the lion's share of the corporate cash flows and buy and sell the figureheads in our two craven political parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to watch corporate marketing&#8217;s more thoughtful practitioners (the ones who even bother to think about larger issues) contort themselves to find comfort with their own trade.  Murketing wants to contend that, since advertising has always been unpopular, then popular revulsion against it is just a constant thing that need not trouble anybody.  Besides, murketing says, the dislike for corporate brainwashing campaigns has never really led to action, so it must be mere trivia:</p>
<p>&#8220;Clearly there were people who could “see through” marketing in the late 19th century, and who could count an audience that would get the joke. Just as clearly, seeing through marketing didn’t quite add up to resisting marketing. Kinda like today.&#8221;</p>
<p>What murketing fails to mention is the complete and consistent lack of avenues for opposing the marketing juggernaut.  The topic has always been forbidden in politics.  What would happen if it became a topic of ongoing democratic debate?  We may never know, because that prospect is ANATHEMA to the moneyed elite, who own the lion&#8217;s share of the corporate cash flows and buy and sell the figureheads in our two craven political parties.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lies, damn lies, and advertising the Information Revolution by kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/03/14/information-revolution-my-arse/#comment-17</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/03/14/information-revolution-my-arse/#comment-17</guid>
					<description>They were giving away free computer mice today in Central London. Their slogan is "Ask: The Other Search Engine" and they're using the same font as the illegal and tube adverts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were giving away free computer mice today in Central London. Their slogan is &#8220;Ask: The Other Search Engine&#8221; and they&#8217;re using the same font as the illegal and tube adverts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lies, damn lies, and advertising the Information Revolution by artnotads</title>
		<link>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/03/14/information-revolution-my-arse/#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/03/14/information-revolution-my-arse/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>Thanks, yoghurt-knitting Kelly. I don't know what disgusts me more: hippies in Stoke-Newington, or 3rd-rate corporations that get away with illegal advertising campaigns.

Okay, so it's the 3rd-rate corporations. Especially the ones who cynically prey upon the current vogue for faux-libertarian privacy rights. What a shower of bastards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, yoghurt-knitting Kelly. I don&#8217;t know what disgusts me more: hippies in Stoke-Newington, or 3rd-rate corporations that get away with illegal advertising campaigns.</p>
<p>Okay, so it&#8217;s the 3rd-rate corporations. Especially the ones who cynically prey upon the current vogue for faux-libertarian privacy rights. What a shower of bastards.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lies, damn lies, and advertising the Information Revolution by kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/03/14/information-revolution-my-arse/#comment-14</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.artnotads.com/blog/2007/03/14/information-revolution-my-arse/#comment-14</guid>
					<description>Not only on the tube but also illegal adverts stuck to lampposts in Stoke Newington. I had assumed it was Stokey hippies from the anti-Starbucks squat from the poor quality of the adverts. When I saw it on the tube, I assumed it must be a big corporation in order to be able to afford the space. Good detectiving!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only on the tube but also illegal adverts stuck to lampposts in Stoke Newington. I had assumed it was Stokey hippies from the anti-Starbucks squat from the poor quality of the adverts. When I saw it on the tube, I assumed it must be a big corporation in order to be able to afford the space. Good detectiving!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
